What standard is established by Graham v. Conner for evaluating use of force?

The standard established by Graham v. Conner for evaluating use of force is the Standard of Reasonableness. This landmark Supreme Court case set a precedent that the appropriateness of an officer's use of force must be evaluated under an objective standard. The ruling emphasizes that the determination of reasonableness should consider the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with hindsight. It takes into account the facts and circumstances confronting the officer at the time, thereby recognizing that officers often have to make quick decisions in tense and rapidly evolving situations.

This standard aids in balancing the need to use force against the threat posed by a suspect, highlighting that not every use of force will be deemed unreasonable even if it results in injury. Consequently, the determination hinges on the context, including the severity of the crime, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat, and whether they are actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight. Understanding this framework is essential for law enforcement officials to ensure that their actions are justified under constitutional guidelines.